# Update: Softprovement Proposal Ideas

**URL:** <https://forum.thesoftdao.com/t/update-softprovement-proposal-ideas/394>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Tags:** update\
**Created:** [August 31, 2022, 1:05am UTC](https://forum.thesoftdao.com/t/update-softprovement-proposal-ideas/394 "2022-08-31T01:05:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![numbers](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/forum.thesoftdao.com/numbers/32/106_2.png) [@numbers](https://forum.thesoftdao.com/u/numbers)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2022, 1:05am UTC](https://forum.thesoftdao.com/t/update-softprovement-proposal-ideas/394/1 "2022-08-31T01:05:36Z")

</div>

An improvement proposal process can be helpful in the decision making process around open-source protocols. A process like this helps ensure that decisions are made deliberately and methodically with ample community input and support. Several improvement proposal process come to mind, although they tend to differ:

[Python Enhancement Proposal](https://peps.python.org/pep-0001/):

- Started in June 13 2000
- Designed to provide a concise technical specification of new features and the associated rationale
- Designed for a technical audience
- Has a standards track, an informational track and a process track
- Dual license of public domain / CC0-1.0-Universal

[Bitcoin Improvement Proposal](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki):

- Started in September 19 2011
- Designed to provide a concise technical specification of new features and the associated rationale
- Designed for a technical audience, also contains economic implications
- Has a standards track, an informational track and a process track
- Variety of licenses recommended or acceptable

[Synthetix Improvement Proposal](https://sips.synthetix.io/)

- Started in June 9 2019
- Contains a [main page](https://sips.synthetix.io/) and a separate SIP page
- Has a SIP track which is standard and a SCCP change for system configuration variables, this may be preferred for economic variables
- CCO

In order to better to meet the goals of this project, it seems viable that the appropriate process will:

- Have two tracks at least, one standards track and one parameter / variable track
- Have a variety of editors to prevent gridlock
- Have a hosting system similar to synthetix
- Be called an “enhancement process” vs. improvement process

 ![soft](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/uploads/softdao/original/1X/28e73e90360b78c0d09ea10c00200110e2c79026.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![numbers](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/forum.thesoftdao.com/numbers/32/106_2.png) [@numbers](https://forum.thesoftdao.com/u/numbers)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2022, 6:25pm UTC](https://forum.thesoftdao.com/t/update-softprovement-proposal-ideas/394/2 "2022-09-01T18:25:33Z")

</div>

SOFT ENHANCEMENT PROPOSALS FOR REVIEW

 ![one](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/uploads/softdao/original/1X/c4900118859f16d547d2f9af51833d80e3ab5d30.jpeg)

> <https://github.com/SoftDAO/SEPs/pull/1/files>

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KomaRick](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/forum.thesoftdao.com/komarick/32/3655_2.png) [@KomaRick](https://forum.thesoftdao.com/u/KomaRick)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2022, 4:51am UTC](https://forum.thesoftdao.com/t/update-softprovement-proposal-ideas/394/3 "2022-10-03T04:51:07Z")

</div>

![imgonline-com-ua-Resize-ghDtJfvye2S](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/uploads/softdao/original/1X/85cfb20cc7ff407e7170a0fa658195fb89e3a369.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stupoorcycle](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/forum.thesoftdao.com/stupoorcycle/32/100_2.png) [@Stupoorcycle](https://forum.thesoftdao.com/u/Stupoorcycle)\
**Post date:** [October 13, 2022, 10:39pm UTC](https://forum.thesoftdao.com/t/update-softprovement-proposal-ideas/394/4 "2022-10-13T22:39:11Z")

</div>


