Everyone who participates in the sale must necessarily have a minimum deposit amount on their account!
Thus, we will identify more real participants applying for allocation!
Advantages: 1. Most of the insolvent accounts will be excluded. 2. Insolvent accounts that may prevent real participants from using the queue. 3. This increases the guarantee of timely payment! 4. More efficient distribution to real users!
I would happily vote for that one. Thatβs definitely one of the possible approaches that Coinlist lacks. Definitely, this wouldnβt help from 1-5-10 multiaccounts, however, I expect huge farms would suffer.
Yes. Exactly! I meant that this is definitely an additional measure! Which will create problems for those who, without having a deposit, are building up farms of empty insolvent individuals. If they have conditionally 15k accounts, then they will have to fork out! This creates difficulties for a certain strategy. I see that a lot of offers have already been created.
Ordinary people, participants, and users will have the opportunity to receive an allocation more often.
Thus, DECENTRALIZATION will increase.
My option is an augmented
Youβre right, your suggestion will protect us from multi-accounts, for example wallets that do not have $100 may raise suspicion, empty wallets are more likely to be a means of multi-accounts.
Yes!
This is better than when thousands of empty multiaccounts are able to participate in the Coinlist and at the same time replenish only the amount issued. They donβt have to keep real money commensurate with their number of personalities!
I propose to conduct a reconciliation of the face before each purchase. And, if possible, fix the wallets to which funds are withdrawn in order to exclude one owner from 100 wallets
I do not see how this would identify the multi account users. The best way to limit the multiaccounts, imo, is to use webcam during sales and check if it matches with KYC biometrics.