I agree that it is necessary to lower the entry threshold to 15 k, but it is better to do this when the coin is already being traded
1 Like
As someone who is new to the Soft DAO community, I believe that lowering the threshold for launching proposals via Tally could be a good idea. While I understand the importance of ensuring that proposals are thoroughly considered and have enough support before being launched, I also think that making the process more accessible could encourage more community members to get involved and submit their ideas.
Perhaps there could be a tiered system where proposals that meet certain criteria, such as a minimum number of supporters or a certain level of community engagement, are given priority for consideration. This could help balance the need for thorough consideration with the desire to make the process more accessible to a wider range of community members.
Overall, I think itβs important to keep an open mind and be willing to experiment with different approaches to proposal launching in order to find the best balance between accessibility and quality of proposals.
1 Like
ΠΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ! Π― ΡΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π·Π° ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠΎ Π±Ρ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ³ Π΄ΠΎ 3000-5000
1 Like
Π’Π°ΠΊ Ρ Π½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠΎ-ΠΌΠΎΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΠ΄Π°ΡΠΎΡ ΠΎΡ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Ρ
ΠΎΠΌΡΠΊΠΎΠ²)) ΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΎΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π΅Ρ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π° ΡΠΎ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π΄Π²ΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 
Great idea to lower to optimum threshold. You may find the distribution of the amount of softdao tokens or the holders. Then use a certain percentages such as 75%
1 Like
Agree with the idea of proposal. More peeple will have a chance.
1 Like
Great, 15k just right
But no less, later come back to revision
1 Like
I think that the threshold decrease is a great idea as more members of community will be able to participate in governance which will help further decentralization. 15 000 threshold is acceptable, but I suppose that it will best to lower threshold to 10 000.
1 Like
You can set this threshold with an expiration date. Letβs use that threshold for the next three months and analyze the activity. After the allotted time, based on the results of the analysis, raise or lower the threshold.
1 Like
I support lowering the threshold. You might also consider lowering it to 10 000. That would be more affordable for most people.
2 Likes
In general, this is good for the community, but to start with, it would be good to know the price of the SOFT token
1 Like
I think itβs a good idea, 10000 itβs quite impressive
2 Likes
I think its a Good idea, i think 10k is good!
1 Like
ΠΡΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ! Π‘ΠΆΠΈΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ³Π° Π½ΡΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡ!
1 Like
Pretty wise proposal! make sense to do it. 
1 Like
In fact, people who decided to submit a proposal for discussion should clearly understand βWhat they are doing and whyβ. Most of the community that talks about the 5000 threshold are actually delegating their votes and will never create a proposal for a vote.
First of all, it should be understood that the creation of a proposal for a vote is an important event and affects the entire community. Therefore, really qualified and experienced people should be able to create proposals, and most importantly, people who are dedicated to the project, so I believe that the threshold of 100,000 should remain.
1 Like
I can give an opinion based on validator votes on the networks. Usually the threshold is so low that anyone can make a suggestion. And then itβs up to the community to accept it or not.
1 Like
I support the lowering threshold. Itβs absolutely reasonable.
1 Like
I support lowering the barrier to entry. The lower the threshold, the more users will be able to log in. The bigger, the better.
1 Like
This is a good proposal to make the SoftDAO governance process more accessible for the community.
1 Like