It’s just amazing! The idea is the bomb. I like this layout! I support you in every way!
2 Likes
I think it is better to lower 10k. There are a lot of small token holders and maybe they will be the ones creating new offers.
2 Likes
I think that 100k tokens is really a lot. I think it is better to downgrade for creating new proposals on Tally for SoftDAO. But to implement this, there is a need to delegate blocked tokens. There are a lot of small token holders and maybe they will be the ones creating new offers. I suggest a threshold of 30k tokens.
2 Likes
I agree that lower the threwhold will give efficency
let’s do it
2 Likes
I think it should be reduced to 10 thousands, 15k is too much
1 Like
I support this idea for 100% Good solution to lower to optimum threshold. I think that the threshold decrease is a great idea as more members of community will be able to participate in governance which will help further decentralization. 15 000 threshold is acceptable, but I suppose that it will best to lower threshold to 10 000.
2 Likes
Great, more community members can access the governance .
2 Likes
Ultimately, the decision to lower the threshold for launching proposals should be based on a careful analysis of the benefits and drawbacks, as well as the current needs and priorities of the Soft DAO community. It may be useful to gather feedback and input from a variety of stakeholders, including existing members, potential new members, and experts in decentralized governance and decision-making processes. By taking a thoughtful and deliberate approach, the Soft DAO can continue to evolve and improve over time, while also staying true to its core values of transparency, inclusivity, and community-driven decision-making.
1 Like
Delegation allows for people to collectively back someone who aligns with their interests, which is already a feature of Tally. Good for degens like us sure! Fully support the plan.
2 Likes
I definitely support lowering the threshold. since the more people there are, the more likely it is to make the right decision. but, I agree that it is impossible to lower too low. I propose a threshold of 20,000.
2 Likes
This is absolutely great. It’s important that we reach more people
2 Likes
Lowering the threshold for voting in the Soft DAO community is a good idea. It would increase inclusivity and engagement. The proposed threshold of 100,000 tokens is too high. It could be reduced to 10,000 or even lower. This would allow more members to participate and make proposals. Accessibility is crucial for the success of the DAO.
2 Likes
more community members can access the governance
2 Likes
I am also in favor of lowering the threshold, but here we need to find a middle ground so that interested participants of the platform participate in the management and I think the threshold of $ 5000 is the most optimal
2 Likes
I propose to make a vote on lowering the threshold, I think this is a great idea
2 Likes
100k is a very high threshold despite the fact that active participants were rewarded on the airdrop by 2-3k.
I think 10-20k is enough to participate in management.
2 Likes
I support lowering the threshold from 15,000, this is a great opportunity for many users, for more interaction, I suggest lowering it to 10,000 or even 5,000
2 Likes
I dont think this will be good for the DAO. I think there will be a barrier to people to say everthing they think.
1 Like