I didn’t read all the answers one by one, but here is my idea…
I think we can follow the logic in exchange tokens. Let’s say the supply of the project that wants to launch is 1b. If this project wants to be launched on the platform, it must first give 1% 2% of the token supply to SoftDAO.
80% of the amount allocated to SoftDAO should be allocated to stakers within a launch pool.
10% will be given to the team, half of the remaining 10% will be converted into SOFT tokens and burned, and the other half will be allocated for community events. We can investigate exchange tokens (like BNB, HT, GT …) in detail and follow a launch project similar to that system, of course, we have to be more generous to our stakers or our platform users.
It is very nice to see that tokensoft is entering the market, I was really waiting for this and participated with pleasure in the testnet, I vote positively for the proposal.By the way, I would like to add the forum is very decently decorated and pleasing to the eye!!!
Why not distribute tokens among the community. As the well-known project … did recently, they gave liquidity to the market, and also attracted huge interest in the project.
Since you plan to launch a grant programme I would strongly recommend to carry out the DAO treasure diversification . This could be done in two ways: 1) By converting a certain percentage of the Treasure (I would recommend 10% at least) into stable coins or 2) By the Treasure diversification inv round before the token launch. These will help to
maintain sustainability during the downtrend on the market
keep Soft tokens from the treasure for the longer term by allocating grants in stablecoins at the beginning
guarantee that the DAO could fulfil its financial obligations and continue its development and growth, including in terms of grant programmes, in the times of the down trend
Personally, I would opt for the option 2 (DAO inv round) as it will guarantee certain % of stablecoins in the Tresure no matter what the price of the token is. Moreover, it will be a sign of legitimacy for the DAO from the VC community.
All in all, diversification is definitely needed.
2. Genesis Governance. It is very important to establish a mechanism that token locked for the Genesis Governance are included in the whitelist allocation programme. So that most loyal members of the DAO are not excluded from the opportunities the Tokensoft opens.
I would be strongly against any staking programmes since it will lead to a drop oriented approach rather than the mission oriented approach. Besides it would be just waste of money to reward passive people just because they hold Softtokens.
Since the Governance process requires both great efforts and time I would suggest rewarding most active users. Particularly, I would suggest to set a certain reward for creating valuable proposals for the DAO (in case proposals are approved ofc).
The $SOFT token could function to offer guaranteed allocations in Tokensoft sales. By reserving a set of allocations to holders, we can ensure proper incentive alignment.
Airdrop will be good for hype and reward early adopters.
Good utility and tokenomics. This shows that Tokensoft cares about the community and the development of the project
this is a top-end project, I expect to launch as soon as possible, it will be a top-end launchpad that will launch projects with a good fundamental. I’m glad to spend time together with such efficient project.
A great way to incentivize and encourage users to purchase and hold the $SOFT tokens would be enabling the holders (with a proof-of-reserve concept or something similar) to be included in the white-list for other launchpad projects in the ecosystem.
The system management of the DAO has improved, which before the system was slow, but now it is appropriate for the whole world to see the performance of the DAO.
There is an idea that there should be a ranking system, the success of DAO participants as a result of their decision-making. In case of making successful or unsuccessful decisions, it should change. In addition, the participant’s behavior should influence voting power.
On top of that, it would be great to require teams launching on Tokensoft to purchase SOFT Tokens.
I know that there may be other basic requirements, but it can be one utulity.
my suggestion for the use and usefulness of the token
$SOFT. for example, the $SOFT Token can be used as one of the options for paying for the purchase of coins of a project that conducts a token sale on the Tokensoft platform. For example, a person can pay for the location in conditional Ether, or in $SOFT.
This will ensure that the $SOFT token will always be needed and valuable.
I my opinion to increase the value of the token on Launchpad will be great. If you will have many $Soft tokens- you will more coins get from another project
