Hello, I have written some of my thoughts about this item, and I would like to know your opinion on this:
Welcome to the large and friendly Tokensoft community. I’m glad to be at the origins of such a project. I am optimistic about the success of Tokensoft as a truly decentralized source in the world of monopoly and speculation.
My comment will deal with the distribution of Droop to early supporters and here’s what I think:
Token blocking under TGE is commonplace in the community. But vesting is an individual tool that can inspire followers and frustrate with a different approach. I have a question for the team why such a long vesting for followers? The price of a token in a difflationary model and a 2% allocation from the total souplai will not affect the price of a token. As for keeping early supporters committed to the project, the motivation can be found in other tools - status, rank, special treatment and others… (if supported by the community is willing to make a suggestion and decision on this).
My suggestion for vesting: a yearly continuous distribution schedule after a 3 month lock-in period.
Please do not judge harshly and be supportive.
Best Regards Nick
Greetings! In general, I tend to agree with you, your arguments have weight! But the longer the period of vesting, the longer the period of involvement in the life and management of the DAO!
Also, all of you forget that our Tao has 35% allocated to the treasury… We will be able to raise any proposals for a vote. Incl. for additional distribution of tokens among the early supporters of the project.
I think we should launch with the proposed tokenomics. After all, we will have the opportunity to make any adjustments afterwards.
I think the team will distribute the tokens correctly and there will also be great interest among buyers.
So far, the document about $SOFTDAO token distribution; token allocation part is clear and simple. But we also need to provide the safety and liquidity as well as future information updates.
I do suggest about treasury that we need to considerate the most since it will be the key to success or destroy itself (that happens with many DAO in the past)
firstly, as you want to make it transparency, all assets in DAO needed to be tracked in case of sudden/unpredictable attacks taken place. the SoftDAO community will involve the update/monitoring of asset portfolio. But if the attack happened, you do not need to wait for the vote to deal with anonymous/crook as the survival of DAO is up to this.
the referral in treasury part might not be friendly because treasury is meant to keep and reserve for the sudden incident, for example; false bear market, real bear market, inflation, recession, economic events, and other external factors.
There is the proposal about the token max supply (1b token) which I do think it is inflated. Burning mechanism is not a holy key to preserve token values; example from Solona, AVAX, and NEAR that only burn token in tiny amount from transaction fees. To adding value, you need to build the usable products on DAO.
Lock up periods are fine but if you want to adjust the amount of max token, you might need to re calculate the token allocation/distribution.
Stable coins are considered low risk for the safety/treasury (not algo stable coins of course)
Unlocking tokens based on BTC price increments is a decent approach to utilize because it gives users and the protocol a bigger benefit (if the DAO uses arbitrage as an additional strategy, too). However, setting a price ceiling in advance to unlock tokens is a little dangerous and a gamble. Alternately, you might use percentage change.
I invite the community to think and include my new Proposal in tokenomics
The Treasury, like an octopus’s head, must give reasonable orders through its tentacles. it 's quite balanced - I 'm holding it
Hello, i am new in forum/
IMHO good offer. I am delighted!
but I did not see the distribution of tokens for testers in it.
What percentage of tokens do you plan to distribute to those who helped test the system?
There is SoftDrop mentioned for incentivized testnet participants and early community with 2% of supply
I support this distribution option and well-written vesting, this is the best strategy with a long-term perspective
an initial 3-month lockup period with a two year, continuous vesting schedule
sounds good to me, but also I think Future Developer Bounties for 8.0% is a bit small
Dystrybucja tokenów jest na dobrej drodze, ale wartość klakjakaiajjnuq8ghs8q7g8sq7h9ijnsoiiahs87y2e8uqhidnbsikaujgdiuygdiuaygdu8yg
One of the best tokenomics I’ve seen in the last year.
Everything is compiled as grammatically as possible !)
Hello again, I would like to know your opinion what you think about my offer here, thank you. I think that the schedule of breaks is not quite correct.
oh this is a hard case yes you need to write a roadmap, we really appreciate your contribution to the Dao community well, very much
Hello! what can I say?! All community members will be rewarded with tokens, the opportunity to participate in the management of the DAO, sounds good! I am also sure that the large stock of the Treasury will allow us to adjust many nuances, as necessary. In particular, we will be able to consider the issue of increasing awards to early participants and testers. The fact that community members will get rewards and have the change to have an active role in management it’s also a big plus as are the vesting periods.
im very excited about token distribution. i think that unclaimed tokens could be burned.i think that vesting is good option
In general, I think the distribution of tokenomics among community members is excellent, it is especially nice to see great care for the early participants and developers, who have put a lot of effort into the development of the project. for other members of the community, there is motivation to strive and in what direction to develop. good luck to all! and may drops be with us!
In my humble opinion we need more tokens for the DAO treasury. Most other DAOs have up to 70% tokens allocated to treasury. Let’s do 40 to 50% to have more liqudity and ways to interact with protocols
I think the distribution scheme is fair and interesting. Support this strategy token distribution!