Fair, you know everyone wants to go their way, but that’s ok. There shouldn’t be such a price dump. Some projects already do that.
I want to know that we testers can get some rewards? And OGs?
How to get the DAO role in discord? There’s no more information i can get.
Takensoft recently updated its portal and conducted a number of testnets, 5 testnet was never closed, there were also problems with Humanode sale. Have you considered other options ?
very good allocations, do it, it’s fair and transparent, everybody will be happy, the true dao style
This project have nice tokenomics. Will be a good part of DAO Treasury. good luck and go to the moon
The tokenomics looks good but i think percentage of softdrop and comminity round will increase thus decentrelation will improve.
SoftDAO dao is sure to distribute correctly! Great team, dream team!
Focus on early adopters and investors.
It look’s good for a long term life of the project. Good tokenomic, but airdropy for early supporters should be a bit bigger…
Is there a telegram channel ? Who found the like-repost. Twitter is also desirable. It’s easier for me to track the news there.
took sometime to go through the tokenomics, it’s looking pretty great with lots of community feedback to help improve the project $SOFT
Guys, I think it would be good to increase the airdrop allocation to 5% by reducing the treasury a bit. This would ensure, in my opinion, more project awareness (don’t forget about the marketing) and in the long term bigger success for the project.
Interested in whether there will be an equal number of tokens that will be distributed to early participants, in order to avoid coalitions in the voting?
The token allocation sounds good the best point : Friends & Family Round, Early Supporters, and Operational Costs: Tokens in these categories would be subject to either time-based or price-based lockups or vesting schedules
It’s great to see overview of SoftDAO Token Allocation. By the way, I hope that
we’ll get more clear detail through clarification from the team because there’re still some points that I don’t understand, for example, the difference between Friend & Family Round and Community round in term of criteria, and which one is the portion for team and investor?
Hello, I have written some of my thoughts about this item, and I would like to know your opinion on this:
Welcome to the large and friendly Tokensoft community. I’m glad to be at the origins of such a project. I am optimistic about the success of Tokensoft as a truly decentralized source in the world of monopoly and speculation.
My comment will deal with the distribution of Droop to early supporters and here’s what I think:
Token blocking under TGE is commonplace in the community. But vesting is an individual tool that can inspire followers and frustrate with a different approach. I have a question for the team why such a long vesting for followers? The price of a token in a difflationary model and a 2% allocation from the total souplai will not affect the price of a token. As for keeping early supporters committed to the project, the motivation can be found in other tools - status, rank, special treatment and others… (if supported by the community is willing to make a suggestion and decision on this).
My suggestion for vesting: a yearly continuous distribution schedule after a 3 month lock-in period.
Please do not judge harshly and be supportive.
Best Regards Nick
Greetings! In general, I tend to agree with you, your arguments have weight! But the longer the period of vesting, the longer the period of involvement in the life and management of the DAO!
Also, all of you forget that our Tao has 35% allocated to the treasury… We will be able to raise any proposals for a vote. Incl. for additional distribution of tokens among the early supporters of the project.
I think we should launch with the proposed tokenomics. After all, we will have the opportunity to make any adjustments afterwards.
I think the team will distribute the tokens correctly and there will also be great interest among buyers.
So far, the document about $SOFTDAO token distribution; token allocation part is clear and simple. But we also need to provide the safety and liquidity as well as future information updates.
I do suggest about treasury that we need to considerate the most since it will be the key to success or destroy itself (that happens with many DAO in the past)
firstly, as you want to make it transparency, all assets in DAO needed to be tracked in case of sudden/unpredictable attacks taken place. the SoftDAO community will involve the update/monitoring of asset portfolio. But if the attack happened, you do not need to wait for the vote to deal with anonymous/crook as the survival of DAO is up to this.
-
the referral in treasury part might not be friendly because treasury is meant to keep and reserve for the sudden incident, for example; false bear market, real bear market, inflation, recession, economic events, and other external factors.
-
There is the proposal about the token max supply (1b token) which I do think it is inflated. Burning mechanism is not a holy key to preserve token values; example from Solona, AVAX, and NEAR that only burn token in tiny amount from transaction fees. To adding value, you need to build the usable products on DAO.
-
Lock up periods are fine but if you want to adjust the amount of max token, you might need to re calculate the token allocation/distribution.
-
Stable coins are considered low risk for the safety/treasury (not algo stable coins of course)
-
Unlocking tokens based on BTC price increments is a decent approach to utilize because it gives users and the protocol a bigger benefit (if the DAO uses arbitrage as an additional strategy, too). However, setting a price ceiling in advance to unlock tokens is a little dangerous and a gamble. Alternately, you might use percentage change.
I invite the community to think and include my new Proposal in tokenomics