A very difficult choice.
The first site reflects a certain technology and interestingly reflects the essence of the project.
The second site is more user-friendly and easier to perceive.
Maybe it is necessary to unite two developers and give them the opportunity of a joint project?
I liked the first option, but I think that it is not finalized. It also uses a lot of dull colors, on which the font is hard to read.
the name must be done with a font like the logo.
We need to think about the background so that it contrasts more with the font color of the text.
In general, the second option is more animated, and more impressive, although it is made on a template basis.
none of the designs proposed would be approved as final, as there would first be an approval via multisig followed by a discussion resulting in a revision round or two
First of all, I thought both creations were fabulous!
I voted for Nozam. The color theme seemed to match softdao and the information was easy to visualize. I thought the text font in the very first introduction could be smaller and the line spacing could be closer together to make it easier to read.
Fully supportive! We need to keep in minde that the presented options are only primary sketches. I consider it necessary to give the authors additional time to discuss the wishes of the community, and put them into practice. And I do not exclude that during this time another candidate may appear
Good job, guys! I Fully supportive! We need to keep in minde that the
The first site reflects a certain technology and interestingly reflects the essence of the project.
The second site is more user-friendly and easier to perceive.