Hi all! I love both options! I voted for Nosam. His site visually suits me! Guys thank you for your work.
2 Likes
Hello!! I want to support both authors, good work has been done, these two sites look great! Thank you!
2 Likes
Votes for the first one, but both sites look nice to me! Good work and thank you for your protocypes!
1 Like
I voted for R_Z, in my opinion their option better. But both contestants are good - may the one voted for by the community win 
1 Like
Both tried and both are worthy. My vote is for R_Z. Thanks to the participants for their contributions!
1 Like
Both offers are worthy. All the candidates did a great job. But the choice had to be made. Choose the one with the best logo. It would be possible to combine the efforts of developers to achieve the desired result.
1 Like
It’s fantastic,Let’s get started! , Both authors tried hard
Maybe it is necessary to unite two developers and give them the opportunity of a joint project
1 Like
I voted for R_Z,I liked color this theme. Great job, looks fresh! I really like! Keep moving!
thanks for such hard work both of you guys, appreciated a good job!
1 Like
The choice is not easy
I voted R_Z
I found his examples more interesting)
But Nosam has cool examples too)
May the best win 
1 Like
My vote is for R_Z. Very cool! Thanks to the participants for their contributions! Actually, this sort of activity is making me believe that our community is real and strong, and I expect much of our projects.
1 Like
My choice R_Z.
Both options are good
But I liked the version from R_Z a little more.
Huge work was done by all participants, well done!
1 Like
Hello guys! I voted for R_Z, I liked color this theme, purple, blue, orange…but I would like to see a smoother transition from dark to light. This white that could shine on the eyes, I don’t know… Anyway, thanks to the participants for their contributions!
1 Like
Good job guys!!! Nice work. Hope the project can help enhance the overall crypto world. Thank you so much for the activity
1 Like
Good job, guys! I am totally on board with this! Remember that the first site reflects a certain technology and, interestingly enough, reflects the core of the project. This is something that we need to keep in mind.
1 Like
Good time everyone 
Both options are good and both options are the same.
Guys, this is SOFTDAO!!!
Perhaps there is an option to consider something unique and at the same time as simple as possible.
.
Excuse me, I understand that it is easiest to criticize, I will try to justify. Also, don’t forget that everyone has different tastes.
.
From what I would proceed in the development of web design:
. Mass adoption - Everything should be clear even if the person is the first time. No, not like that - everything should be clear, even if we force the monkey to make a purchase. Sorry for this comparison.
. Concentration on the process - when a user enters a sale, he should not be distracted by anything, he should not be distracted at all, he came with one goal - to acquire an asset. We all know what a sale is and how quickly it happens.
. Structured and accurate placement of links to official accounts, documents, etc. The user should not look for official information.
. Static. Yes, it’s about the user not being distracted by anything, but it’s also about the importance of the web. It seems to me, purely subjectively, serious platforms do not use dynamics. Perhaps quite a bit and only in order to display some kind of process. In the general view, dynamics is not needed.
. The design should be clean and eye-catching at the same time - how to implement it? this is where the SOFTDAO community comes in handy.
.
PS: sorry, there may be inaccuracies in translation
1 Like
displays very accurately 
I like it 
.
It turns out because of the limitation I can not answer briefly. I understand why this was done, but it seems to me that this will not really help to encourage the participants of the DAO to be constructive.
.
SOFTDAO
1 Like
Thats great 
good job, guys! I voted for R_Z option, because for my opinion it’s more suite for SOFT DAO!
2 Likes
hi, I liked the second site more. it is better perceived and seems more professional to me. although both deserve applause!
2 Likes
Good job, guys! A very difficult choice. I voted for RZ. Thanks you for your contributions! 
1 Like
I like both options. Everyone did a decent job. Voted for both but everyone needs to evolve and improve their offerings. In the first case, the logo is nicer but not perfect.
1 Like