this option is the best, since there are not so many problems with getting into the top 100, but you have to work hard to make it.
TOP10 is not serious for a project like TokenSoft. I propose to divide the awards according to the following criteria:
TOP10, TOP20, TOP50, TOP100
About Award prizes to the top 10 ranking users on Soft DAO’s Crew3 Leaderboard, Can we have more Top10 like top 5,000 for the next round?
I agree with that approach. But in widely range. For example top20, top100, top250. Therefore total 370 users get rewards. Community deserves a fairer distribution.
I think the suggestion is acceptable. Anyway, It’t better than nothing. However, I don’t like rewards like merch
I have long put forward a proposal to reward active members of Crew3, so YES, I fully support the proposal to reward the top 100 members of Crew3
With such a huge community, I would suggest to give out BIG rewards to top3 and some other rewards to top100. Love The Soft DAO!!!
This is a good offer, as getting to 100 is a good chance! I support and good luck to everyone.
A lot of users were waiting for this, finally it happened. However, I think that both the sustainability and continuity of the “crew3” should be considered, the reward system should be completely based on sustainability.
I think it is a good suggestion to reward after bots are distinguished, but I think it needs a little more time to reward and wait for it to mature more in terms of time.
In order to ensure the sustainability of these tasks, I think that it is more logical to introduce a reward system according to the number of tasks done in order to ensure the continuity of rewarding, not one-time
In this way, reward targets can be set for tasks that have not yet been determined.
100 task completion ==> Prize XXX
200 task completion ==> Prize XXXX
500 task completion ==> Prize XXXXX
In this way, the reward system can be made difficult, spread over time and continuity can be ensured.
In fact, people who diligently perform quests worthy of reward, and it motivates them even better to promote the project!
Good! Agree that. Fully endorse it. We should reward good contributers. For pushing our community n brands agenda n all.
Thank you for putting together this proposal for rewarding the top users of the Crew3 platform. Your proposal to issue on-chain rewards to the top 100 users each month, in the form of On-Chain Authorization tokens, or OATs, is a creative solution to incentivize continued engagement and support of Soft DAO.
Additionally, the plan to reward the top 10 ranking users on the Crew3 leaderboard with Soft DAO merchandise and other prizes is a great way to acknowledge and reward the efforts of the most active members of the community. I appreciate the requirement for users to complete verification in order to be eligible for Crew3 prizes, as it helps ensure the fairness and transparency of the rewards program.
I do have a few suggestions for your proposal, however. First, it may be helpful to include more information on how the OATs will be distributed. Secondly, you may consider exploring additional reward mechanisms, such as early access to new Soft DAO products or events.
Overall, this is a well-structured and thoughtful proposal and I am excited to see it move forward.
무조건 참여하는 참가자들에게 있어 리워드를 줘야
나중에도 많은 유저들이 올것이다. 예를 들어 가입일순으로 준다거나, 활동량에 비례하여 리워드를 준다거나 혹은 다양한 홍보를 한사람들을 위해 준다거나
It’s a great Proposal and moreover I think the team should be fair with the members regarding what they promised in the last sprint. it was already a snapshot. Do not ignore it.
I wanted to offer to give an award not to 100 users, but 150 or 200, since the project is large, there are a lot of active users and 100 is a lot.
Thank you for your inform. I try to do that Crew 3 .
So some quest is nice to me.
It so good about your activities on project.
Don’t forget to inform to your commu.
I agree that it is necessary to award the top 100, hft and drop, it would also be nice to award the top 1000 but with a smaller reward
Here is a great idea. In the end, not everyone has time to complete all the tasks. Many people have a main job and they are not able to get into the top 100 participants.
I did nothing and I am in TOP 1000. I think that you can really reward maximum TOP 100. More than 100 definitely do not need.
I think it good to give reward but you can give reward for more people about 150 people or more. It’s be fair for all participate