Distribution. Crew3. Version 0.01

[jAleksey]

@CitizenWrit

@jAleksey– солидные мысли и предложение, спасибо, что уделили этому время и подсчитали некоторые цифры. Вот некоторые мысли:

Thanks for the high rating. It’s valuable to me

@CitizenWrit

1. I think non-$SOFT rewards are better right now. It’s not yet clear how many $SOFT will be in circulation or the implications of giving away 1 million tokens.

I agree. That’s the right decision. At this stage of development, it is not clear what amounts can be handled. My values are taken as an example in the continuation of discussions on the forum. The main purpose of the theme was the designation of principles and thoughts for a fair distribution.

@CitizenWrit

2. To reduce bots, Soft DAO could require passing KYC for Crew3 rewards eligibility. This seems like a prudent practice to me.

KYC can solve this problem, but there is one caveat.
If we move in the direction: SoftDAO member. - Registered member of Tokensoft. - Registered member of Crew3. Everything is good here. Only this can limit the number of participants in Crew3.
If we move in the direction: a potential member of the DAO. No registration on Tokensoft. Under these conditions, the introduced KYC may alienate new potential SoftDAO contributors.

@CitizenWrit

3. I agree that Crew3 rewards/incentives are something that Soft DAO should consider. I think the primary questions surround how much funding should be allocated for this and how to implement.

It’s hard for me to navigate this issue. Here we must proceed from the effectiveness of the result from Crew3. I think there are metrics on this site that allow you to do this. If Crew3 delivers real outreach and delivers real positive results, then only promotional/rewards costs can be assessed.

@CitizenWrit

4. I’m curious – how much funding do you – and others – think the DAO should put toward Crew3 rewards? Put in other words, how much funding should the DAO put toward incentives to complete Crew3 tasks?

It all depends on the result of using Crew3. Is there any benefit from this and how significant it is for the development of SoftDAO.

@CitizenWrit

5. I think there is a strong case to be made for other community quests/incentive tools. Other platforms include channels like Galxe, for example.

It will only add strength. The more activities in the network, the more successful SoftDAO will be.

@CitizenWrit

I think the DAO must remember and consider that these will require funding as well.

Unfortunately, a very small percentage of participants think about this (subjective opinion). Therefore, it will be necessary to balance between the costs of the needs of the DAO (ensure development) and the costs of rewards (ensure the satisfaction of participation). Participation satisfaction is the fuel for further activities. It turns out a vicious circle where a competent balance is needed.
.

In any case, rewards can be with the following parameters:

• combined
• not static
• transforming over time
• transforming depending on market conditions
• cost-transforming DAOs
  and so on …
  This can be taken out in a separate topic.

PS: I wrote about the NFT here: NFT or one of the ways to replenish the SoftDAO treasury
Key message: - The NFT utility must be financially valuable. - NFT should be in deficit.

PSPS: Yes, I agree, sometimes I also think that I complicate

.
#SoftDAO - rock web3