To create transparent, understandable, and clear conditions for ambassadors, moderators, active participants, and anyone interested with different talents and skills.
This will ensure the most important principle of DAO - transparency. It will also ensure the interest of participants in Soft DAO with different skills and talents. With specific tasks and clear conditions, it will improve the quality of execution and ensure transparency in the Soft DAO development process.
DeWork is platform for web3 teams to engage with internal & external contributors, pay contributors while boosting their reputation for work completed, discover how DAOs get work done and how to work with contributors.
It allows all kinds of projects to work openly or privately, and have contributors participate through tasks either by application, open submissions or gated claiming.
Using this tool will completely close the issue of transparent operation of SoftDAO.
Creating a successful DAO requires more than just transparency; trust and collaboration among members are also key.
While I respect the intention behind the proposal to create clear and transparent conditions for ambassadors, moderators, and participants with diverse talents and skills, I must respectfully disagree. While transparency is an essential principle for DAOs, it’s not the only one, and other considerations must also be taken into account. For instance, too much transparency can jeopardize the privacy and security of community members. Moreover, while DeWork platform may be advantageous for some projects, it might not be the best fit for all. Therefore, it’s crucial to consider the unique requirements and circumstances of each community before implementing a one-size-fits-all approach. Although I appreciate the initiative to enhance transparency and clarity within the Soft DAO community, a broader range of factors and options must be taken into account before making any decisions.
An interesting initiative. But I have a few questions.
You suggest adding ambassadors and community leaders there. While there is a long range of subjective factors - for example, such as the time spent, the quality of moderation, checking crew3, the quality level of work with information, including in matters of proposals. There are also several other functions that cannot be evaluated objectively. And the list goes on…
Because of this, I believe attempts to introduce a rating system among leaders and ambassadors will create additional tension among the team - and this will definitely have a bad effect on teamwork
Due to the above - it is impossible to agree with this statement…
I admit that the use of this platform as a whole can be effective in terms of attracting and rewarding talented people both from the Soft DAO community and from outside. But what about Crew3? Looks like it already fully satisfies these tasks. So if you think it’s worth spending the extra time and resources of DAO & Core Team on DeWork - we need more arguments in favor of this platform. Share your experience. Does DeWork have significant advantages over Crew3?
In addition, a proposal for Crew3 awards from the treasury has already been prepared… What do you think of this moment? What manipulations with the DAO Treasury do you propose?
Develop Clear Guidelines and Procedures: SoftDAO should develop clear guidelines and procedures for proposing, organizing, and executing activities. These guidelines and procedures should ensure that activities are aligned with SoftDAO’s mission and values, and that they are organized efficiently and effectively.